HDMI 1. In general, the consensus seems to be about 50 feet for p and feet for 4K video, but distances of over 50 feet are achievable. HDMI requires a hardware handshake that will not happen if you were to do what you have described, you might consider looking at an HDMI signal distribution block, that would do what you are describing. It simply produces an identical HDMI signal on both monitors. This means one end is labeled source or 1 and the other end is labeled TV or 2.
The cable must be connected in the proper direction to work. There are other ways to transfer an HDMI signal across long distances using both wired and wireless solutions. Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search.
Here they are. Walmart's marketplace has dozens of HDMI cables. Of the ones the company seems to sell itself, evidenced by the "Free Pickup" tag, the Tripp Lite linked here claims in one place to be 18Gbps. If you dig down through the details you can find that it does have a lifetime warranty.
I can't see any reason to get this cable over Amazon or Monoprice, but it's an option. One exception is a 4-foot Philips cable, which is relatively cheap at press time. And maybe you have a Target gift card and nothing better to spend it on. They say it's only rated to Most of Best Buy's cable offerings are outrageously expensive. But some of its offerings aren't bad. Over short distances, say under 6 feet, just about any recent "high speed HDMI cable" should work fine.
You can think of bandwidth like a pipe. You need to be able to get a lot of "water" through the pipe with 4K and HDR content. A high speed cable needs to be "big" enough to handle it all. Unfortunately, there's no way to tell just by looking at a cable whether it's a high speed HDMI cable that can handle the deluge of data required for 4K and HDR content. Even if it says High Speed on the jacket, that's not percent useful.
A cable can be considered a "high speed HDMI cable" if it passes p, but not be well enough made to handle 4K.
The only way to verify it works as high speed HDMI is to test it. The good thing is, if it works, it works. That's not how the technology works. There are only two "fails" with an HDMI cable. The most likely is you won't get any signal at all: A blank or flashing screen.
First, check that everything's connected correctly and all your HDMI device settings are correct. The only other "fail" mode of HDMI cables is sparkles. This looks like snow on the screen.
It can be heavy enough to look like static, like an old TV tuned to a dead channel, or it can be random-but-regular flashes of white pixels. This means you'll need new cables. If the TV is receiving the same resolution you're sending it e. A different cable won't make that image sharper, brighter or anything else. Also remember, if one step in your chain isn't 4K HDR, nothing is. Check your owner's manual for that, too.
The latest version of HDMI is called 2. This is a huge leap forward in terms of bandwidth, capable of up to 8K resolutions and beyond. Actually, even if you are buying an 8K TV, you probably don't need them.
For more info on that, check out HDMI 2. Some of you, though, are looking for something with a longer cable length. There are a lot of variables to consider, which we'll discuss, so we don't have a simple pick. In broad strokes, the build and material quality is much more important in a long HDMI cable than short. Realistically, it means that the occasional error will pop into the audio track. This means the receiving equipment can detect an error and correct it, as though it never happened.
In other words, there is no longer an error. In simpler terms, it's describing how a signal might not be properly in sync. This is because all digital data uses a clock to synchronise transmission, with each clock cycle a tick if you will used to send a bit of data.
When plotted on a graph, you get a square graph with the values going up and down. When the clock is accurate, each bit is sent at a perfect time interval, but the timing is often not as accurate as you may think. For example, rather than sending data every second, you may find that the first signal goes out at 0.
With jitter distorting the transmission, two things can happen. First, repeated errors can make the receiving device believe that is has a 0 instead of a 1 or vice versa , introducing an error. A bigger difference is made by the quality of the Digital-to-analog Converter DAC , which takes digital sounds and converts it back to the analog sounds we hear, but even this pales in comparison to the quality of your speakers and AV receiver.
Scientific explanations are all well and good, but it's practical testing where the talking stops and the evidence starts. To prove the doubters wrong, we upped the ante and decided to test full-motion video to prove that changing cables makes no difference. Crucially, it performs no error correction, so we can accurately compare the output from different cables and spot any errors. For test footage, we used the open-source film Tears of Steel.
In order to compare different cables, we needed to ensure that the captured footage was the same regardless of the cost of the cable. To do this we used the TrueHD capture card to capture a few seconds of Tears of Steel for each cable, saving the results in an uncompressed video file. Once we got 50 frames from our range of test cables, we needed to compare them.
In order to compare the files, we generated an MD5 hash of each image, which can be thought of like a digital fingerprint, as is represented as a digit hexadecimal number, such as 6add8f2f6edee97bfcbfe2f5e7. In short, if the MD5 hash of two files is the same, the files are forensically identical. This tool is designed to mathematically and visually show the differences between two files. This allows us to see where the error is. In our first set of tests, 49 of the 50 frames we captured from the expensive cable were completely identical to the 50 produced from the cheap cable.
With the one frame that was different, we got two completely different MD5 hashes. We needed to find out where the error was, so we used Compare to highlight the error and found that there was a one-pixel error. To see if you can spot where the error is, take a look at the images below and see if you can spot the difference: the top image is from the cheap cable, the middle image is from the expensive cable and the bottom image is from the expensive cable click any image to view it full-size.
Hard to tell, right? If we crop into the image see below to show the error, spotting a single-pixel error is incredibly hard. Look at the top-left of the right-hand image and look for the red pixel.
This is the error, which is the difference between the cheap cable left and expensive cable right.
0コメント