The addition of 8-cross type sensors would be reason enough for excitement, but it gets even better. While shooting video, you can use the new touch screen to select a focus point from one of the 31 zones on the LCD. Because of the efficiency of the processor along with the new sensor , the native ISO range of the T4i has been increased to from in the T3i. Canon has had a hole in their lens line-up for years, waiting to be filled with a high quality, walk-around, general-shooting lens, and the new mm lens appears as though it will fill the spot nicely.
The zoom range covers what would have been the mm zoom range on a traditional 35mm camera many journalists historically have carried and mm lenses to cover the same range, though professionals use lenses with larger maximum apertures. Though there are significant differences between the T4i and the T3i, a great deal remains the same. Many of the similarities can be seen in the table below:.
Similarly, the body style and layout of the T4i remain virtually unchanged from the T3i, though minor cosmetic changes were made. Unlike the T3i, the new T4i is an obvious recommendation for most people who are interested in buying an entry level Canon. Buy the T3i or T2i if you:. Buy the T2i if you:.
However, please feel free to ask me any questions that you may still have in the comments section below! Check your inbox or spam folder now to confirm your subscription. Learn Photography. Photography Basics: Correcting Bad Exposure. Photo Composition: Leading Lines. Articles about the art, the business, and all other aspects of photography. Photography in Orchha, India.
Share Tweet. Camera Comparisons. The T4i has a touchscreen , while the T3i has a conventional panel. Touch control can be particularly helpful, for example, for setting the focus point. For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process.
The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS Rebel T3i and Canon EOS Rebel T4i and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras and selected comparators provide for accessory control and data transfer. Both the T3i and the T4i have been discontinued , but can regularly be found used on eBay. Further information on the two cameras e. So what conclusions can be drawn? Is the Canon T3i better than the Canon T4i or vice versa?
The listing below highlights the relative strengths of the two models. If the number of relative strengths bullet points above is taken as a guide, the T4i is the clear winner of the contest 6 : 2 points. However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera.
A professional wedding photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a travel photog, and a person interested in cityscapes has distinct needs from a macro shooter.
Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one. How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon T3i and the Canon T4i place the cameras among the top in their class? In any case, while the comparison of technical specifications can provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it remains incomplete and does no justice, for example, to the way the T3i or the T4i perform in practice.
User reviews, such as those found at amazon , can sometimes inform about these issues, but such feedback is often incomplete, inconsistent, and biased. This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.
The above review scores should be interpreted with care , though. The ratings are only valid when referring to cameras in the same category and of the same age.
A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and comparisons of ratings among very different cameras or across long time periods have little meaning. It should also be noted that some of the review sites have over time altered the way they render their verdicts. Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? If you would like to see a different side-by-side camera review , just use the search menu below.
There is also a set of direct links to comparison reviews that other users of the CAM-parator app explored. Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features. Exposures are generally good, and white balance is most often correct.
Of course Nikon is good also. Pretty every manufacturer today makes excellent cams. The same guy that made the SL1 gear of the year. Actually it's larger then the d becouse of the new collapsible kit lens. Which i could not not show you. The website doesn't have it yet. A remarkable show of complete and utter laziness from canon. None of them are best for travel. Some facts please. I believe OP is that way also. Other reviews are also positive about IQ.
Many of those at least mention that SL1 cam is on par with competition. Okay, there are choices. So what. Lolski, that DxO It depends on usage. This makes huge difference to skip on many strong points of competition.
It might be surprising that there are also some weak points or just personal preference. No the lens doesn't make the Canon crap. The 5 year old sensor baked on a absolete nm node is doing that.
Then you have the crappy 50mm from canon vs the very good 50mm f1. So the D is more expensive by a little bit. You can buy an D for close to nothing these days. In what aspect is the Canon system better as the nikon system. I know some long prime lenses but those are hardly relevant with Dslr's in this price range. I agree that m43 is a better travel companion. The Olympus Em or GX7 are good alternatives though. I fell asleep. SL1 still has lower height and width.
Hope what is that maybe 1. In some dimensions still smaller. With that old Nikon lens Canon is also ligher. No dual pixel sensors before. Anyway we talk about image quality and noise performance here, not about other capabilities. That way you must understand that L lenses in hand versus G lenses in some shop is not the same for me. This is why we ask OPs many questions, his current gear, possibilities etc, and it can turn out that small image quality difference is nothing compared to OPs situation.
I can buy new SL1 with the same price difference no matter what. Still very cheap, especially with only IS kit lens. I agree there are situations or some ISO speed values where Nikon is better with noise. But All of these are pretty unusable for big photography with enaugh quality and up.
If I compare normal range for quality output, and downsize Nikon to Canon image size, I see no wipeout or smoking as you wrote. Nikon D left, SL1 right. If you ever manage to see Nikon as better, it should hella be better for that price! Not just on par. So this all looks like Canon keeps up even with ancient sensor. Good for you, good for all of us. Is it worth the hefty price tag? We take a look at the Cine, the high-end model in this series. The Nikon Z9 is the company's first camera to feature a stacked CMOS sensor, which brings a raft of new features, including blazing speed and autofocus performance to the Z lineup.
Click through for our detailed first impressions of Nikon's latest professional ILC. The Sony a7 IV is the fourth generation of the company's core a7 full-frame mirrorless camera model, and it's the most advanced yet. Click through for an in-depth look at Sony's latest full-frame mirrorless ILC.
0コメント